Always private
DuckDuckGo never tracks your searches.
Learn More
You can hide this reminder in Search Settings
All regions
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium (fr)
Belgium (nl)
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada (en)
Canada (fr)
Catalonia
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India (en)
Indonesia (en)
Ireland
Israel (en)
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia (en)
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan (en)
Peru
Philippines (en)
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain (ca)
Spain (es)
Sweden
Switzerland (de)
Switzerland (fr)
Taiwan
Thailand (en)
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
US (English)
US (Spanish)
Vietnam (en)
Safe search: moderate
Strict
Moderate
Off
Any time
Any time
Past day
Past week
Past month
Past year
  1. worksinprogress.co

    We are still at the collection-of-deviations stage. There are not 200 human biases. There are 200 deviations from the wrong model. Why we study biases. The collection of deviations in astronomy did have its uses. Absent the knowledge of heliocentric orbits, astronomers still made workable predictions of astronomical phenomena.
  2. frontlinebesci.com

    "We don't have a hundred biases, we have the wrong model." So said Jason Collins in a recent blog, perhaps somewhat provocatively likening the use of biases as akin to the activity of ancient astronomers who were required to compile an exhaustive number of deviations to retain the broken model of the universe revolving around the earth. Collins challenge is whether the model at the heart ...
  3. news.ycombinator.com

    Of course it is wrong. It is a model. That doesn't mean it is not useful. Howard Marks (highly successful investor over many decades) has this to say about it ... We have some wrong models but this does not mean we don't have biases. The simplest way to disprove it: If we did not have biases but wrong models, fixing models would make us unbiased.
  4. The agent specification is hard. Even after doing that you would then need to model that agent in those domains. TBH, the bias framework may just be a lot easier to model, as it is rationality + bias, not a complex multi-faceted cognitive agent we're now trying to plug into a supply/demand curve for real estate.
  5. thelivinglib.org

    We don't have a hundred biases, we have the wrong model Curated on Posted on August 15, 2022 August 15, 2022 by Stefaan Verhulst Blog by Jason Collins: "…Behavioral economics today is famous for its increasingly large collection of deviations from rationality, or, as they are often called, 'biases'.
  6. Finding the "correct" model is the holy grail of behavioral economics and there are probably thousands of researchers (myself included) who are working towards that. The difficulty is to find a simple model that fits most known biases. But even if we found such a perfect descriptive model, some biases are very clearly mistakes in decision making.
  7. podcasts.apple.com

    We don't have a hundred biases, we have the wrong model. quinneunderwood's Narrations. Play . A narration created by quinneunderwood. Episode Webpage . Information. Show. quinneunderwood's Narrations. Frequency. Updated Daily .
  8. weeklyfilet.com

    Learning about cognitive biases — the dozens, hundreds of them — is always satisfying. It feels like you've uncovered a hidden secret that powers human behaviour, and knowing them will help you avoid making biased judgements. Which made this take especially refreshing — what if they aren't biases, but our entire model of rational behaviour…
  9. Can’t find what you’re looking for?

    Help us improve DuckDuckGo searches with your feedback

Custom date rangeX